Let’s Stop Thinking of Disability as a Problem at Work

Posted on Wednesday, November 5, 2025 by Karen SmithNo comments

When people talk about disability and work, the conversation often starts in the wrong place. Too often, it begins with what someone might need, what might be difficult, or what adjustments might have to be made. The focus quickly turns to what a person supposedly cannot do, rather than what they bring to the table. This way of thinking creates a quiet divide between “us” and “them.” It paints disability as an obstacle, when in truth, the real obstacle lies in the systems, spaces, and attitudes that were never designed to include everyone in the first place.

Disability is not an exception to normal life. It is part of what it means to be human. Every person’s body, mind, and experience of the world is different. When we build workplaces around a single image of what a “typical employee” looks or functions like, we are not being efficient — we are being exclusionary. True inclusion begins not with policies or slogans, but with a mindset that understands diversity as ordinary. It’s not about “making room” for people with disabilities; it’s about recognising that they were always meant to be here.

When employers see disability through this lens, the whole conversation changes. It becomes about talent, perspective, and innovation. People with disabilities are not problems to solve — they are potential that workplaces have failed to unlock.

Barriers That Still Exist

In the UK today, there are more than eight million working-age people living with a disability or long-term health condition. Many of them want to work, are qualified to work, and would enrich their workplaces if given the chance. Yet employment rates reveal a stubborn and troubling gap. Only around half of disabled people are in work, compared with more than four out of five non-disabled people. This divide is not inevitable. It is created and reinforced by barriers — physical, digital, and cultural — that continue to make job seeking harder for disabled people.

For many, the difficulty starts before they even step through the door. Recruitment websites still fail basic accessibility tests. Application forms are designed for speed rather than fairness, punishing anyone who types more slowly, uses assistive technology, or needs extra time to think. Interviews are too often held in inaccessible buildings, or in formats that don’t allow candidates to show their best selves. Even when companies claim to welcome disabled applicants, the experience of applying often sends another message entirely: you don’t belong here.

These barriers are not just frustrating; they are exhausting. They chip away at confidence and reinforce the sense that inclusion is conditional — that a person can only belong if they fit a narrow model of ability. And yet, the world of work is poorer for it. Every inaccessible form, every awkward interview, every missed opportunity represents lost creativity, lost skill, and lost perspective.

Changing the Way We Think

It is easy to talk about inclusion as a moral duty, and it certainly is that. But inclusion also makes practical, economic, and creative sense. Workplaces that welcome people with disabilities are forced to think differently about how work happens. They learn to adapt, to listen, and to value outcomes over appearances. That kind of thinking doesn’t just benefit one group — it makes the entire organisation stronger.

Teams that include disabled employees are often more resilient and imaginative. They’re used to problem-solving in the real world, where flexibility is key. They also mirror the diversity of customers and communities more accurately. After all, the world outside the office is not uniform. It is full of people with different abilities, bodies, and needs. Companies that understand this diversity are better placed to serve it.

But beyond the business case lies a deeper human truth. Work is more than income. It is dignity, belonging, and purpose. When workplaces exclude disabled people — through design flaws, outdated attitudes, or misplaced fears — they deny access to all of those things. And that is not just a personal loss for each individual; it is a collective failure of empathy and imagination.

Creating fair and accessible work isn’t just about ramps or software. Those things matter, but the bigger challenge is cultural. Too often, disability is seen as something to manage — an issue to be handled discreetly, or a burden that needs to be balanced against productivity. This attitude feeds discomfort on both sides. Managers worry about saying the wrong thing; employees worry about revealing too much. The result is silence, when what we need most is conversation.

Imagine if the starting point were different. Instead of asking, “Can you manage this?” an employer might ask, “What helps you do your best work?” That small shift turns a potential barrier into a partnership. It invites honesty, builds trust, and recognises that success comes in many forms.

When disabled people are free to be open about their needs, the benefits ripple outward. Flexible schedules, clear communication, and thoughtful design don’t just help one group — they make the workplace more human for everyone. Parents, carers, and people balancing mental or physical health all thrive in environments built on understanding rather than suspicion. Accessibility is not charity. It is simply good design — design that assumes variety instead of perfection.

Representation matters here too. Seeing disabled leaders in visible roles changes how organisations think. It challenges the quiet prejudice that still links disability with limitation. When someone with a disability leads a team, makes key decisions, or represents their company publicly, it sends a powerful message: ability is not defined by conformity.

Learning from Real Lives

Numbers can tell part of the story, but they don’t move hearts. Real progress happens when people understand what exclusion feels like — and what inclusion makes possible. Stories create that bridge. They remind us that this is not an abstract policy debate; it’s about real people navigating real systems.

The software developer who once struggled through inaccessible testing now excels because the process changed. The teacher who returned to work after an accident found new confidence because her school adapted instead of replacing her. The recent graduate who needed questions in writing for an interview finally landed his dream role because someone listened. These are not exceptional cases; they are glimpses of what happens when we stop gatekeeping talent.

The future of work should build on those lessons. The pandemic, for all its hardships, proved that flexibility and remote work are possible. For many disabled people, it opened doors that had long been closed. It showed that with the right mindset, change can happen quickly. Yet as offices reopen, some of those gains are being lost. Returning to “normal” should not mean returning to exclusion.

Accessibility and inclusion must be part of the foundation, not an afterthought. They should be written into every policy, built into every system, and considered in every meeting where decisions are made. And the people who live with disability should help design those systems from the start. Inclusion works best when it’s built with people, not for them.

The truth is that every one of us, at some stage in life, will face some form of limitation. Illness, age, injury — these are part of being human. Building workplaces that support disabled people today means building workplaces that will eventually work for everyone. It’s time to stop treating disability as a problem that needs fixing. The real fix lies in how we see each other, how we design our systems, and how we define success. When we recognise that difference is normal and inclusion is strength, we don’t just change the workplace — we change what it means to belong.

Previous PostNext Post

No comments on "Let’s Stop Thinking of Disability as a Problem at Work"

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required unless otherwise indicated.